Free preview -> paid AI margin diagnostic
Find out if one AI workflow is eating your margin.
Upload a sanitized usage CSV, preview the first margin signal, then request a written diagnostic when the file shows a real workflow, customer, retry, or failed-run risk.
Free sample included · local CSV preview · early diagnostic from $149 when the file has signal
27% of its spend comes from retries. Add a soft cap and instrument failed outcomes before scaling.
Add one explicit useful-result field before relying on automated margin reporting.
No platform migration is recommended from the available evidence.
What the report reveals
$49/month can look profitable until one workflow costs $41.20.
Stripe tells you what the customer pays. Provider bills show aggregate spend. The report connects those two through workflow, customer, usable outcomes, retries, failed runs, and plan assumptions.
Generic observability explains what happened technically. The margin report asks where money is leaking and which decision should change next.
See the sample margin report- Plan revenue
- $49.00
- Workflow cost
- $41.20
- Retry spend
- 27%
- Margin left
- $7.80
Sample AI margin output. Actual findings depend on the CSV columns and pricing context available in your product.
Preview first, pay after signal
Know what the diagnostic will answer.
Start with sample data or a local CSV preview. Request the deeper written diagnostic only when the file has enough signal.
Review provider cost, retries, failures, customer/workflow attribution, and pricing context.
Start with exported logs or metadata. Prompt bodies, response bodies, secrets, and customer data are not needed for preview.
Receive the evidence table, health finding, data gaps, and recommended cap, pricing, reliability, or model action.
If the file does not show meaningful exposure, the report should say so instead of inventing work.
The first version is built directly by Duman Torbayev. Verify on GitHub.
Qualified use case
Best for paid AI products that already have usage data.
The diagnostic is intentionally narrow: one workflow, one export, one economics question.
Use it when fixed plans or client retainers need a workflow-level cost check before caps or pricing change.
Partial data is okay. The preview will show whether the CSV has enough signal or which fields are missing.
If monthly provider spend is under roughly $100, the report may honestly say there is no material margin issue yet.
Use Langfuse, Helicone, or a gateway if your immediate need is traces, latency, evals, or live production monitoring.
AI Margin Diagnostic
$149Async written decision report for one AI workflow or usage export.
- Free CSV preview before payment
- Workflow, customer, retry, and failed-run margin signals
- Evidence table, data gaps, and recommended next action
- Delivered in 2-3 business days after scope is agreed
Deep Workflow Audit
$399+For teams whose export needs column mapping, normalization, or deeper segment review.
- One larger workflow or multiple related exports
- Column mapping and data-shape review
- Customer/workflow concentration analysis
- No subscription or live monitoring included
CSV fields
Your CSV only needs business metadata.
The preview works best with fields that connect provider spend to a workflow, customer, outcome, and pricing snapshot. Do not upload prompts, response bodies, secrets, API keys, or private customer data.
Request an early AI margin diagnostic when the preview shows a real signal.
Start in the app with sample data or a local CSV. Use this form when one workflow has enough signal for a written review of margin leaks, data gaps, and the next pricing, cap, reliability, or instrumentation decision.